Six questions every agency should answer before committing to a website template engine or platform.
If a web agency rebuilds the same infrastructure for every new project, the question "should we systematise this?" eventually becomes unavoidable. Here are the right questions to ask when evaluating a template engine:
A good template engine separates content from code completely. A content change should not require a deploy; a component change should not cause content loss. In AstroForge, content lives in JSONs and code lives in Astro components — they don't know about each other.
What agencies need isn't just a site template but a system that manages multiple client sites efficiently. Does the CMS require a separate setup per client, or does one system manage all clients?
"Git push = site live" shouldn't be a luxury — it should be the standard in modern web development. Platforms like Cloudflare Pages automate this. Systems requiring a control panel login, FTP, or SSH in 2025 are no longer a competitive choice.
The security advantage of static sites is often overlooked. If there's no server-side code, SQL injection, SSRF, and code injection are impossible. For performance, pre-rendered HTML is always faster than server-rendered HTML.
TypeScript support, automatic schema generation, CLI scaffold tools — these directly affect developer productivity. Finding the answer to "how is this done?" shouldn't require 30 minutes of documentation reading.
Can the system built today be easily updated two years from now? Are dependencies staying current? How exposed is the plugin ecosystem to security vulnerabilities? The Astro + Cloudflare combination gives strong answers to all of these.
Astro SSG: Why Static Sites Belong Here | AstroForge Blog
2025-05-10How Multi-Tenant CMS Works | AstroForge Blog
2025-04-18Git-Backed Content Management | AstroForge Blog
2025-03-25The Organism System: From Component to Page | AstroForge Blog
2025-02-14Schema Pipeline: TypeScript to CMS Form | AstroForge Blog
2024-12-20